covers hooks, extractors, selectors, properties, actions and the order to write them in, with a complete sample spec that typechecks against the real export surface.
the leg disables animations and the number was measured with them on. the
first real dispatch carries 4 transitional steps over 200, so the cross-fade
wait does still fire in ci, just far less often.
The check that decides whether the select-all worked looked for an
"editable" attribute maestro's tree does not carry, so it answered
"cannot tell" every time and every erase paid the per-character
fallback. Worse, an open keyboard puts a second focused node in the
tree, one of the IME's own keys, carrying no text: taking the first
focused node would read a field still holding 4096 characters as empty,
which is the one answer that stops the erase early.
Match the text field by class instead. Measured against the real
backend, 4096 characters now clear in 385ms on API 34, 409ms on API 35
and 870ms on API 36, verified empty, where the fallback took ~4s.
maestro's eraseText sends one delete per character through its
instrumentation, measured 29.6 ms/char on the API 34 emulator. The
4096-character string the corpus types cost ~121s to clear, a fifth of a
20 minute run spent on one step, and it recurred every time that field
was typed into again.
Select the content and delete the selection instead: two key events at
any length, measured 0.15s to 1.16s for 4096 characters across API 34,
35 and 36. The result is read back off the tree, and a field that is not
empty, or that the tree cannot report on, is finished off per character
in batches rather than assumed clear.
Fixes#80
New performs the clear-state reset, so the uninstall and reinstall no
longer land underneath a live XCTest session that is already bound to
the app. Launch refuses a clear-state request the driver was not built
for rather than reinstalling under its own session.
An unreadable dumpsys passed a null owner to typeChunks, which switches
the mid-type focus guard off outright and lets the rest of the string
spray into whatever holds the foreground. Fall back to the launched
bundle instead: the guard stays armed, typing still happens, and the
degradation is said out loud rather than assumed away.
The window is an upper bound on the transactions an interval could hold, and
a bound inflated by taps that commit nothing is a bound the app can never
exceed: #78 read a rise of 15 transactions against 37 submits. TxnSubmit is
clickable(enabled = amount.isNotBlank()) and parseCents refuses anything its
regex misses, so a tap whose landing frame shows a refused amount cannot have
committed. Over four recorded android runs that is 19, 11, 25 and 25 of 35,
26, 42 and 42 submit taps.
A relaunch is excepted: a fresh process draws an empty field whatever was
submitted.
Defaulting the count to zero made a dumpsys that said nothing mean
nothing is animating, so a degraded link broke out of the settle early
and handed the runner a frame caught mid-animation. Unknown now waits,
inside the deadline waitForIdle already holds.
adbOutput and readLogcat read to EOF and then waited with no timeout, so
a wedged adb held the step for as long as it liked; one stall over a
remote adb server measured ~100s. The bound has to sit on the read, not
on waitFor: a wedged adb never reaches EOF, so a bounded waitFor after
the read is a line that never runs.
The proof behind the comment: "Travel1" holding 25 transactions and
"Travel12" holding 5 merge to the same string, so no identity key read off
a web card can tell them apart.
Folio rejects a duplicate account name, so the twin the drop rule guards
against is two names the web key cannot tell apart, not two accounts
sharing a name. State what closing the rest would cost and what the tree
would have to carry to close it properly.
The runner now keeps lastAction and marks it relaunched: true where it used
to report nothing at all, so the two properties that demand an effect judge
a step whose process may have died before the write landed.
submitChangesBalanceByTypedAmount and createdAccountHasNonZeroBalance both
decline there. The counting bound does not: a relaunch cannot manufacture a
transaction, and the submit is counted, so declining would throw away the
detection the runner fix restored.
pj