Files
sanderling/docs/manual/runs.md
pj 991c583eb9 docs update with case study (#63)
* docs(manual): add introduction page

* docs(manual): rewrite getting started as guided first run

* docs(manual): rewrite writing specs as a folio tutorial

* docs(manual): document missing spec API in reference

* docs(manual): plain-language rewrite of runs page

* docs: real introductions on index pages and README

* fix(docs): sibling links from directory-style pages need ../

* fix(docs): correct sampling and restart-cost claims to match implementation

* docs: nav lists Introduction and Case study; roadmap points to milestone

* docs(manual): make getting started target the reader's own app, not Folio

* docs(manual): add Folio case study page

* docs: point manual navigation at the case study

* docs(readme): lead with the case study, fix roadmap link

* docs: roadmap links to milestone, sync clear-data default and cross-links
2026-06-09 20:13:54 +05:30

67 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Runs
---
# Runs
A run is one `sanderling test` invocation: launch the app, explore it under the spec for a fixed duration, write a trace. Runs typically last minutes to hours, not seconds.
A run is not a unit test. The closer picture is: boot a fuzzer for an hour and see what breaks. A violated property is recorded in the trace and exploration continues, so one run can surface many bugs.
## Lifecycle
```
sanderling test --spec spec.ts --bundle-id com.example.app --duration 30m
│
├── launch the app under test (pass --clear-data to wipe app data first)
├── boot the sidecar (or connect to Chrome on web)
├── bundle the spec, load it into the JS runtime
│
├── step 0..N: read state, check properties, pick and perform an action
│
└── stop when --duration elapses (or on Ctrl+C)
└── trace written to ./runs/<timestamp>/
├── trace.jsonl
├── screenshots/
└── meta.json
```
The trace is written incrementally. An interrupted run is complete up to the step where it stopped.
## App state across runs
By default each run wipes app data before launch and starts cold. Pass `--clear-data=false` to resume whatever the previous run left behind (an account, cached responses, completed onboarding). See the [CLI reference](../cli/#sanderling-test).
## Why runs are long
sanderling does not restart the app every few steps. Restarting throws away two things.
**Accumulated data.** Accounts created, items added, caches warmed, settings changed. Interesting bugs live in apps with history, and a restart wipes it.
**Deep app states.** Many bugs live in states that take many actions to reach: nested settings, a loaded cart, the screen after the third transaction. A 50-step path to "cart with 3 items" never happens if every run starts cold.
Long runs reach states that restart-per-test approaches structurally cannot.
## Setup cost is paid once
Preconditions like login run through the spec's `setup` export (see the [case study](../case-study/#reaching-the-screens-that-matter)). They fire when their condition is unmet and go quiet after, so login costs a few seconds once per run, not once per test case.
| Run length | Login cost | Share of run |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min | ~15s | 5% |
| 30 min | ~15s | 0.8% |
| 1 hour | ~15s | 0.4% |
## Session state
Session tokens, keychain entries, shared preferences, and cookies survive the whole run. If the app logs the user out mid-run, the gating extractor flips, `setup` re-engages, and the run logs back in. No retry logic needed in the spec.
## Termination
A run ends when:
- `--duration` elapses, or
- the process is interrupted (Ctrl+C).
Additional conditions (`--max-steps`, `--exit-on-violation`, hard crash handling) land in the [v0.1.0 milestone](https://github.com/priyanshujain/sanderling/milestone/1).