mirror of
https://github.com/priyanshujain/messageboardbench.git
synced 2026-10-02 11:07:07 +00:00
4.6 KiB
4.6 KiB
Working in messageboardbench
This is the canonical workspace for the experiment. Read EXPERIMENT.md for the
current question, completed results, limitations and next work. The old
../archive/messageboard-20260908 repository is retired; its plans and instructions
are historical. Do not create experiment files there or in a sibling scratchpad.
- Use Codex subagents for analysis and any substantial, independently delegable work: literature review, trajectory review, artifact validation, implementation and review. Assign clear ownership; the primary agent checks and integrates.
- These are internal research assistants, not experimental agents. Do not change the experimental population to include subagents without PJ requesting it.
- Keep root files limited to project entry points and configuration. Put reusable
code in
src/orscripts/, tests intests/, maintained explanations indocs/, retained raw runs inlogs/, and reviewed evidence in namedresults/bundles. - Use ignored
work/for disposable agent working files. Never use a user's personal notes or scratchpad for generated outputs. Promote useful work into an existing documented location; do not leave competing PLAN/STATUS documents. - Treat migrated
results/bundles as frozen evidence. Preserve transcript, artifact and provenance bytes, including historical paths. Use the migration manifest to resolve old paths; write recomputations to fresh output directories. - Use the existing
.venv/bin/pythonand the documentedjust board*workflow.musemeansopenrouter/meta/muse-spark-1.3-contributor; no silent model fallback. - Keep source, Python execution, credentials, logs and results on this workstation.
For every Docker-backed check or experiment, use only the remote x86-64 Docker
daemon at
ssh://[email protected]; do not copy or stage the repository on that host. - Do not launch paid experiments merely to test code or reorganize files. Use offline tests and mock models. Existing user authorization governs actual runs.
- Exploratory experiments are one-off research code. Optimize for the first useful result, not production quality.
- Use simple, direct Python. Do not add frameworks, abstractions, schemas, manifests, provenance systems or reusable orchestration unless PJ explicitly requests them.
- Do not add tests, validation gates, preflight matrices, package builds or production hardening to an exploratory experiment unless PJ explicitly requests them. Let the run fail and debug it from the raw log.
just startmust start the experiment immediately and stream its logs. It must not validate populations, rebuild packages, screen tasks or run tests first.- Never start, restart, resume or stop an experiment. PJ exclusively controls experiment processes and runs the launch commands. Prepare and verify commands, then hand them to PJ to execute.
- Treat infrastructure retries as attempts within the original experiment, not as
new experiments with separate
experiments/folders. Keep their working output under the original experiment's log namespace and promote successful scored attempts into its core results after the run completes. - For diagnosed infrastructure failures, record the affected task IDs, attempt
counts and error categories in the original experiment's existing recovery
record. Once recovery is complete, remove failed retry artifacts and redundant
retry folders rather than retaining full failed traces solely for provenance.
Never delete artifacts from an active run. Do not put infrastructure-only retry
diagnostics in
analysis.md. - Treat process preferences and future-work instructions as prospective, not as permission to change current work. If their timing is unclear, ask PJ explicitly before editing, staging, committing or running anything.
- Distinguish publication, delivered peer receipt, attributed adoption, rejection, and independent discovery. A passing contradictory test or similar code alone does not establish transmission, concealed collusion, or monitor evasion.
- After analyzing a completed experiment, write the maintained interpretation to
lowercase
analysis.mdinside that experiment'sexperiments/<id>/folder. Keep automatic output distinct from reviewed behavioral conclusions and link the exact evidence used. - Prefer a clean code/config commit before launching each new experiment. After the
run and analysis, commit the associated code, frozen configuration, documentation,
and
analysis.mdafter checking for secrets and accidental raw logs. Record the commit hash in the handoff. The executed source snapshot remains authoritative if code changed during or after the run.