A run stops at whichever comes first, the step budget or --duration, so
a clean run that reached the wall clock exited with fewer steps than the
budget and was still credited with the whole of it. The model arm pays a
network call and a screenshot per step, so it reaches the wall sooner and
was handed exposure it never had.
Nothing checked that two arms shared a budget either. Thirty identical
clean runs under budgets of 400 and 100 read a12 0.000 and p 1.685e-14
from the rank-sum while the log-rank in the same report read p 1.0000.
groupArms already refused this within one arm.
The claims the old convention left in comments and report lines are
corrected rather than left standing beside the new behaviour.
Steps to first violation with clean runs right-censored at the budget, since
per-run yield is a binary at 11 to 45 percent and separating two arms on it
would need roughly 80 runs per arm. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, Wilcoxon rank-sum
with Vargha-Delaney A12, Holm within each family.
A hand-rolled log-rank that is subtly wrong is a silent-wrong-number generator
and would be believed, so every statistic is validated against a published
worked example with the source named in the test: R survdiff on aml, Freireich
6-MP, Hollander and Wolfe 1973 for the rank sum, printed p.adjust output for
Holm. Two could not be: the k>2 log-rank, guarded by calibration instead, and
the tie-corrected variance, checked against an exact permutation variance.
Failed and timed-out runs are excluded as missing data and counted by reason,
never treated as censored observations, which would bias the result.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A5KmftdEJ49A9z5mF5ESrX
pj