Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
pj f0726a1e61 fix(analyze): compare arms on censored runs, not on flattened step counts
stepTimes threw the censoring flag away and handed the rank-sum a plain
number per run, so a run the wall clock stopped at step 12 was ranked as one
that violated at step 12. That was defensible while every clean run sat at
the budget, the largest value any run could take, and it stopped being
defensible when a clean run started being censored where it stopped.

Twenty runs clean at step 12 against twenty violations at step 100 read a12
0.000 and p 4.683e-10 from the rank-sum, in the same report as a log-rank
reading p 1.0000. The pairwise comparison is now the Gehan test over the
observations themselves, and the report says how many run pairs censoring
left with no order between them, which is how much of the effect size is the
null value rather than an observation.
2026-08-18 20:13:12 +05:30
pj ca6a05ca5e fix(analyze): mark an action count of unknown provenance in the report 2026-08-18 19:45:58 +05:30
pj 1da0c3e118 fix(analyze): censor a clean run at the steps it ran, and refuse mismatched budgets
A run stops at whichever comes first, the step budget or --duration, so
a clean run that reached the wall clock exited with fewer steps than the
budget and was still credited with the whole of it. The model arm pays a
network call and a screenshot per step, so it reaches the wall sooner and
was handed exposure it never had.

Nothing checked that two arms shared a budget either. Thirty identical
clean runs under budgets of 400 and 100 read a12 0.000 and p 1.685e-14
from the rank-sum while the log-rank in the same report read p 1.0000.
groupArms already refused this within one arm.

The claims the old convention left in comments and report lines are
corrected rather than left standing beside the new behaviour.
2026-08-18 14:11:28 +05:30
pj 2cbe03c3fb fix(analyze): divide by actions that ran
Defects per thousand actions counted every step, including steps that chose
nothing and steps whose action was never dispatched. The inflation is
policy-dependent, so it does not cancel between arms: on the fixture campaign
the model arm's yield was reported at 60.3 per thousand against a true 120.7,
because half its steps did nothing.

A runs.jsonl without the count is refused by name and line rather than read as
zero actions, which would report every per-action rate wrongly. The report also
carries steps beside actions now, so the gap is visible rather than folded into
a denominator.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A5KmftdEJ49A9z5mF5ESrX
2026-08-12 23:43:19 +05:30
pj 019d608f65 feat(analyze): survival analysis over campaign directories
Steps to first violation with clean runs right-censored at the budget, since
per-run yield is a binary at 11 to 45 percent and separating two arms on it
would need roughly 80 runs per arm. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, Wilcoxon rank-sum
with Vargha-Delaney A12, Holm within each family.

A hand-rolled log-rank that is subtly wrong is a silent-wrong-number generator
and would be believed, so every statistic is validated against a published
worked example with the source named in the test: R survdiff on aml, Freireich
6-MP, Hollander and Wolfe 1973 for the rank sum, printed p.adjust output for
Holm. Two could not be: the k>2 log-rank, guarded by calibration instead, and
the tie-corrected variance, checked against an exact permutation variance.

Failed and timed-out runs are excluded as missing data and counted by reason,
never treated as censored observations, which would bias the result.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A5KmftdEJ49A9z5mF5ESrX
2026-08-12 23:03:03 +05:30