WIP: docs: refresh after iOS + web support (#50)

* docs: README covers iOS + web, surface both example apps

* docs(cli): document --ios-device and per-platform doctor

* docs: tighten README, fold examples into Docs list

* docs(runs): correct --clear-data lifecycle wording

Default behavior no longer wipes app data between runs; --clear-data is now opt-in.

* docs(getting-started): add iOS path, separate folio and folio-web

Document just test-ios under examples/folio, and distinguish the KMP
sample from the React + Vite folio-web sample.

* docs(inspect): document the eight panels

Lists Screenshot, ActionList, Timeline, ViolationsPanel, HierarchyPanel,
SnapshotTable, MetricsChart, ExceptionsPanel. Cross-links HierarchyPanel
to the spec language reference.

* docs(writing-specs): document setup export, flag noLogcatErrors as android-only

Mirrors pkg/spec/README.md so the manual covers the runner's setup-first
fall-through. Marks noLogcatErrors as Android-only so iOS/web spec
authors know it silently no-ops.

* docs(folio): document web target and iOS sanderling test recipe

After the KMP refactor folio also runs on wasmJs and the justfile exposes
just web, just web-build, and just test-ios. Surface all three.

* docs(folio-web): add README

Covers prerequisites, demo credentials, just test recipe, and how the
React + Vite host exposes state to the sanderling spec via stable ids
and data-* attributes.

* docs: scrub driver-implementation name from user docs

Drop the implementation tool name from README, cli.md doctor table, and
spec-language.md. These docs should describe behaviour, not the specific
underlying tool the native sidecar wraps.

* docs(development): scrub driver-implementation name from dev docs

architecture, design-principles, decisions now describe the native
sidecar by role (gRPC surface over OS UI-test pipeline) rather than by
the specific tool it wraps.
This commit is contained in:
pj authored and GitHub committed 2026-05-25 16:17:21 +05:30
1 parent b23fb0c723
commit f572c8ba66
12 files changed
+178 -28

No files matched your search

+5 -1
View File
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ A run is not analogous to a unit test. A closer framing is: boot a fuzzer for an
```
sanderling test --spec spec.ts --bundle-id com.example.app --duration 30m
│
├── uninstall and reinstall the app (clean slate, every run)
├── launch the app under test (pass --clear-data to wipe app data first)
├── boot the sidecar, connect the agent socket
├── bundle the spec, load it into goja
│
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ sanderling test --spec spec.ts --bundle-id com.example.app --duration 30m
└── meta.json
```
## App state across runs
By default the installed app is left in place between runs. Whatever state the previous run left behind (account, cached responses, onboarding completion) carries over. Pass `--clear-data` to wipe app data before launch and start cold every run. See [CLI reference](./cli/#sanderling-test) for the flag.
## Why runs are long and linear
sanderling does not restart the app every N steps. Each restart throws away two things.