docs(skills): name the balance predicate that still exists

This commit is contained in:
pj committed 2026-08-16 01:06:59 +05:30
1 parent ef7466e61e
commit 46aba1654f
1 file changed
+3 -2
+3 -2
View File
@@ -64,8 +64,9 @@ evaluation produced the violation; for a deferred obligation (a `next`, an
The discipline is one sentence: open the witness and confirm those values could
actually produce that verdict. An iOS witness read `typedAmount = 0`, and
`submitChangesBalanceByTypedAmount` in `examples/folio/sanderling/predicates.ts`
returns true at `typedAmount === 0` before it compares anything. So the trace
`submitChangesBalanceByAtMostTypedAmount` in
`examples/folio/sanderling/predicates.ts` returns true at `typedAmount === 0`
before it compares anything. So the trace
appeared to show a conviction that could not have happened. The verdict was real
and the artifact was lying, and until that was resolved neither the bug report
nor the fix could be trusted.