docs(skills): name the balance predicate that still exists

This commit is contained in:
pj committed 2026-08-16 01:06:59 +05:30
1 parent ef7466e61e
commit 46aba1654f
1 file changed
+3 -2
+3 -2
View File
@@ -64,8 +64,9 @@ evaluation produced the violation; for a deferred obligation (a `next`, an
The discipline is one sentence: open the witness and confirm those values could The discipline is one sentence: open the witness and confirm those values could
actually produce that verdict. An iOS witness read `typedAmount = 0`, and actually produce that verdict. An iOS witness read `typedAmount = 0`, and
`submitChangesBalanceByTypedAmount` in `examples/folio/sanderling/predicates.ts` `submitChangesBalanceByAtMostTypedAmount` in
returns true at `typedAmount === 0` before it compares anything. So the trace `examples/folio/sanderling/predicates.ts` returns true at `typedAmount === 0`
before it compares anything. So the trace
appeared to show a conviction that could not have happened. The verdict was real appeared to show a conviction that could not have happened. The verdict was real
and the artifact was lying, and until that was resolved neither the bug report and the artifact was lying, and until that was resolved neither the bug report
nor the fix could be trusted. nor the fix could be trusted.