mirror of
https://github.com/priyanshujain/messageboardbench.git
synced 2026-10-02 19:17:07 +00:00
Checkpoint experiments through SWE pilot v2
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
abacd5c5e1
commit
72d77018d8
845 files changed
+431756
-41
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: experiment-analysis
|
||||
description: Analyze a completed messageboardbench experiment, preserve evidence, write the maintained analysis.md in its experiment folder, and commit the associated code and analysis. Use after an experimental run completes or when prior results are reanalyzed.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Experiment Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Produce an evidence-linked interpretation without changing raw run evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read `AGENTS.md`, `EXPERIMENT.md`, and the target experiment's design, plan,
|
||||
manifest, status, automatic report, verification, and resource outputs. Resolve
|
||||
claims against raw transcripts, tool events, audit records, scorer artifacts,
|
||||
and the executed source snapshot when needed.
|
||||
2. Use independent subagents for statistical/artifact integrity and trajectory or
|
||||
communication review. The primary agent checks and integrates their work.
|
||||
3. Validate assignment counts, matched tasks, missing outcomes, limits, scorer
|
||||
execution, tool availability in recorded model requests, report arithmetic,
|
||||
lifecycle completion, and source provenance. Treat `MISSING`/`ERROR` target
|
||||
statuses and setup failures separately from ordinary behavioral failure.
|
||||
4. Separate automatic scorer outcomes from reviewed behavioral labels. For shared
|
||||
communication, distinguish publication, successful tool delivery, peer receipt,
|
||||
attributed adoption, rejection/correction, and independent discovery. Do not
|
||||
infer transmission from similar code. Treat organizer-feedback use as a reporting
|
||||
proxy until its content and timing are reviewed.
|
||||
5. Write or update lowercase `analysis.md` inside the target `experiments/<id>/`
|
||||
folder. Include design and run identity, data integrity, corrected quantitative
|
||||
results, reviewed behavior, communication/feedback evidence, resource use,
|
||||
limitations, conclusions, and concrete next decisions. Link repository-relative
|
||||
evidence and preserve stale or faulty reports rather than overwriting them; place
|
||||
recomputations in a fresh derived location.
|
||||
6. Run proportionate offline validation. Do not launch paid calls or Docker jobs as
|
||||
part of analysis unless the user separately authorizes them.
|
||||
|
||||
## Versioning
|
||||
|
||||
Before a new experiment launch, prefer a clean code/config commit and record that
|
||||
identity in the frozen plan or manifest. After an experiment and its analysis are
|
||||
complete, inspect staged files for secrets and accidental raw logs, run the relevant
|
||||
offline tests, and commit the experiment code/config/docs/analysis. Report the commit
|
||||
hash. If code changed during or after execution, state that the executed source
|
||||
snapshot—not the later commit—is authoritative for the run; never imply otherwise.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
interface:
|
||||
display_name: "Experiment Analysis"
|
||||
short_description: "Help with Experiment Analysis tasks"
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user